| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jarrel
Joined: 23 Dec 2009 Posts: 761 Location: Yewtee
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jasonwo wrote: | | CTEK121294 wrote: | Dude . Erm you should be loking at 16-17 inch .
1.7m . I think too big for a 15. |
i am also around 1.7. i am also riding a S. |
Same here. _________________ Self-pawn? Are we in a game forum where milfs are found??  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edifire_

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 3620
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm 1.76m On a 19inch bike.
Decide for yourself. _________________ In the real world, those with no talent often bark the loudest
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alreadym3
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jarrel wrote: | | jasonwo wrote: | | CTEK121294 wrote: | Dude . Erm you should be loking at 16-17 inch .
1.7m . I think too big for a 15. |
i am also around 1.7. i am also riding a S. |
Same here. |
Thanks, currently still looking for db response comp, hiaz no luck still, h..p le..ng at hougang says distributor no more stock. Anyone sees one at other local bike shop? size s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alreadym3
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Apipot wrote: | im riding the polygon dx 2.0..its more of a dj,street bike.light trails are ok.no problems so far...  |
Hi, light trails is it due to gear selection issue? Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alreadym3
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Russ wrote: | 29 inch inseam? - Polygon S 16in size is OK but just.
Most S bikes have a 28 inch standover, so theoretically, you should be riding XS, which tends to have standover about 27 inch (although all these vary).
The issue is that at 1.7m and with your 29in inseam, you probably have a long torso and arms, and XS will feel cramped above, so S is what you should go for, you may also want to to for a longer stem.
I am 1.6m and have a 29in inseam like you and ride a S Polygon. But actually, I should be riding XS, but Polygon don't do XS..... |
Hi may I know which bike you are riding, is it any of the two polygon choices i have in the list? if yes, how's it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex31
Joined: 20 Jun 2010 Posts: 215 Location: Punggol North
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Try tomac or scotts...quite good quality... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alreadym3
Joined: 26 Jul 2010 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alex31 wrote: | | Try tomac or scotts...quite good quality... |
I believe so too, but really doesn't want to spend so much as there are other commitment to fulfill. Moreover kind of worried will it turn out to be just a moment of ......... for fun.... like my wife always says.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alex31
Joined: 20 Jun 2010 Posts: 215 Location: Punggol North
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brother,
Passion and committement is actually depending if you want to make an effort to do it...
If you have a bunch of kakis who is into cycling, chances are you won't fall out unless you dun have any time...
As for me, I just join rides and know more friends and bro...so far loving it..
Try out different terrain and rides to determine what do you know and I have found mine..
If you stay near Punggol, just give me a shout for rides..
I started my budget below 1k and ended up buying higher cos I know in the long run if I keep upgrading, it will be more...
Brother, just get a secondhand bike to test water...
Good luck in your search...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russ
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 285
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="alreadym3
Hi may I know which bike you are riding, is it any of the two polygon choices i have in the list? if yes, how's it?[/quote]
CX1.0, whihc has a frame very similar in geometry to the Xtrada. For the price, I have no complaints. Frame may not be the best, but the parts are good - great value for the price. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|